Log in
Control Panel
|
|
|
|
Notifications
Who is online?
In total there are 3 users online :: 1 Registered, 0 Hidden and 2 Guests :: 1 Bot
The Last Outlaw
Most users ever online was 156 on Wed Jul 03, 2019 11:22 am
The Last Outlaw
Most users ever online was 156 on Wed Jul 03, 2019 11:22 am
Statistics
We have 32 registered users
The newest registered user is JeffVAU
Our users have posted a total of 4002 messages in 1672 subjects
The newest registered user is JeffVAU
Our users have posted a total of 4002 messages in 1672 subjects
Latest topics
CBOX
Every Trial is a Pursuit of Truth. Will My Colleagues in the Senate Uphold That?
Page 1 of 1 • Share

The opinions in this article are the author’s, as published by our content partner, and do not necessarily represent the views of Bethea's Byte
From Rep. Doug Jones (D - Alabama) to The Washington Post

“Verdict,” from the Latin “veredictum,” means “to say the truth.”
Soon, my colleagues in the Senate and I will be called on to fulfill a solemn constitutional duty: to render verdicts — to say the truth — in the impeachment trial of President Donald J. Trump. Our decision will have enormous consequences, not just for President Trump, but for future presidencies and Congresses, and our national security.
For Americans to have confidence in the impeachment process, the Senate must conduct a full, fair and complete trial with all relevant evidence regarding the president’s conduct. I fear, however, that we are headed toward a trial that is not intended to find the whole truth. For the sake of the country, this must change.
Procedures in prior impeachment trials set no precedents because each is unique to its particular set of facts. Unlike the investigation of President Bill Clinton, Trump has blocked both the production of virtually all relevant documents and the testimony of witnesses who have firsthand knowledge of the facts. The evidence we do have may be sufficient to make a judgment, but it is clearly incomplete.
There are four witnesses who could help fill those gaps: the president’s former national security adviser, his acting chief of staff, the senior adviser to his acting chief of staff and a top national security official in the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). Each has direct knowledge regarding the charges against the president and should testify under oath at a Senate trial.
Let me be clear: I do not know what their answers would be, but I want to hear from them, and so should every senator and every American. We cannot allow the full truth to evade this trial only to be revealed in some future memoir or committee hearing.
Foremost among these four is former national security adviser John Bolton. Public testimony under oath revealed that Bolton abruptly ended a meeting with Ukrainian officials concerning withholding congressionally approved military assistance, as well as a White House visit, later characterizing the discussions as a “drug deal” he wanted no part of. He was alarmed enough to order that the top National Security Council lawyer be informed of what acting chief of staff Mick Mulvaney and Gordon Sondland, the U.S. ambassador to the European Union, were doing.
Anyone truly interested in the truth should demand to hear Bolton’s answers to a number of questions under oath:
“Did you call actions of Mulvaney and Sondland and the withholding of a White House meeting and military assistance from Ukraine a ‘drug deal’? What so alarmed you that you ordered your deputy, Fiona Hill, to report it to the National Security Council’s top lawyer? Or did Dr. Hill get that all wrong?”
In addition, the existence of the whistleblower complaint became public on Sept. 9. Later that day, Bolton either resigned or was fired. Regardless, two days later, military assistance to Ukraine was released. Bolton should also answer these questions under oath:
“At the time you left the White House, were you still sounding alarms about what was going on with regard to Ukraine? Were you fired, or did you resign because you raised concerns? Did the public awareness of the whistleblower complaint cause the administration to release the military aid?”
These questions need to be answered now, not later in Bolton’s upcoming book.
The directive to withhold military assistance to Ukraine came from OMB, where Mulvaney pulls double duty as director. During a news conference, Mulvaney made clear that there was a “quid pro quo” regarding actions taken toward Ukraine, admonishing us to “Get over it” and “We do that all the time.” Within hours, the White House issued a written statement from Mulvaney saying there was “absolutely no quid pro quo.”
Mulvaney should answer a simple question under oath:
“Now that you are sworn to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you God, which is it?” What can Mulvaney’s senior national security aide Robert Blair testify to under oath about this?
We now know that 91 minutes after Trump’s July 25 call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, senior OMB official Michael Duffey sent emails halting the military aid. Only two people could plausibly sign off on that order: Mulvaney and Trump. Duffey should testify under oath as to who it was and his knowledge of the circumstances surrounding it, which can then be evaluated against Mulvaney’s testimony under oath.
Importantly, to evaluate any testimony, all relevant documents need to be produced. Everyone knows a paper trail exists — one always does — and it will either corroborate or contradict the testimony.
Trump has loudly criticized the House investigation but has said he believes the Senate will provide him a fair trial and that he wants witnesses to testify. If he chooses to maintain his blockade, however, the Senate needs only a simple bipartisan majority to issue subpoenas for witness testimony of and relevant documents. Conducting a full, fair and complete trial demands nothing less.
Every trial is a pursuit of the truth. That’s all I want. It’s all each of us should want. Now that it’s the Senate’s time to fulfill its duty, my final question is: Will a majority of senators pursue the truth over all else?
From Rep. Doug Jones (D - Alabama) to The Washington Post
“Verdict,” from the Latin “veredictum,” means “to say the truth.”
Soon, my colleagues in the Senate and I will be called on to fulfill a solemn constitutional duty: to render verdicts — to say the truth — in the impeachment trial of President Donald J. Trump. Our decision will have enormous consequences, not just for President Trump, but for future presidencies and Congresses, and our national security.
For Americans to have confidence in the impeachment process, the Senate must conduct a full, fair and complete trial with all relevant evidence regarding the president’s conduct. I fear, however, that we are headed toward a trial that is not intended to find the whole truth. For the sake of the country, this must change.
Procedures in prior impeachment trials set no precedents because each is unique to its particular set of facts. Unlike the investigation of President Bill Clinton, Trump has blocked both the production of virtually all relevant documents and the testimony of witnesses who have firsthand knowledge of the facts. The evidence we do have may be sufficient to make a judgment, but it is clearly incomplete.
There are four witnesses who could help fill those gaps: the president’s former national security adviser, his acting chief of staff, the senior adviser to his acting chief of staff and a top national security official in the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). Each has direct knowledge regarding the charges against the president and should testify under oath at a Senate trial.
Let me be clear: I do not know what their answers would be, but I want to hear from them, and so should every senator and every American. We cannot allow the full truth to evade this trial only to be revealed in some future memoir or committee hearing.
Foremost among these four is former national security adviser John Bolton. Public testimony under oath revealed that Bolton abruptly ended a meeting with Ukrainian officials concerning withholding congressionally approved military assistance, as well as a White House visit, later characterizing the discussions as a “drug deal” he wanted no part of. He was alarmed enough to order that the top National Security Council lawyer be informed of what acting chief of staff Mick Mulvaney and Gordon Sondland, the U.S. ambassador to the European Union, were doing.
Anyone truly interested in the truth should demand to hear Bolton’s answers to a number of questions under oath:
“Did you call actions of Mulvaney and Sondland and the withholding of a White House meeting and military assistance from Ukraine a ‘drug deal’? What so alarmed you that you ordered your deputy, Fiona Hill, to report it to the National Security Council’s top lawyer? Or did Dr. Hill get that all wrong?”
In addition, the existence of the whistleblower complaint became public on Sept. 9. Later that day, Bolton either resigned or was fired. Regardless, two days later, military assistance to Ukraine was released. Bolton should also answer these questions under oath:
“At the time you left the White House, were you still sounding alarms about what was going on with regard to Ukraine? Were you fired, or did you resign because you raised concerns? Did the public awareness of the whistleblower complaint cause the administration to release the military aid?”
These questions need to be answered now, not later in Bolton’s upcoming book.
The directive to withhold military assistance to Ukraine came from OMB, where Mulvaney pulls double duty as director. During a news conference, Mulvaney made clear that there was a “quid pro quo” regarding actions taken toward Ukraine, admonishing us to “Get over it” and “We do that all the time.” Within hours, the White House issued a written statement from Mulvaney saying there was “absolutely no quid pro quo.”
Mulvaney should answer a simple question under oath:
“Now that you are sworn to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you God, which is it?” What can Mulvaney’s senior national security aide Robert Blair testify to under oath about this?
We now know that 91 minutes after Trump’s July 25 call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, senior OMB official Michael Duffey sent emails halting the military aid. Only two people could plausibly sign off on that order: Mulvaney and Trump. Duffey should testify under oath as to who it was and his knowledge of the circumstances surrounding it, which can then be evaluated against Mulvaney’s testimony under oath.
Importantly, to evaluate any testimony, all relevant documents need to be produced. Everyone knows a paper trail exists — one always does — and it will either corroborate or contradict the testimony.
Trump has loudly criticized the House investigation but has said he believes the Senate will provide him a fair trial and that he wants witnesses to testify. If he chooses to maintain his blockade, however, the Senate needs only a simple bipartisan majority to issue subpoenas for witness testimony of and relevant documents. Conducting a full, fair and complete trial demands nothing less.
Every trial is a pursuit of the truth. That’s all I want. It’s all each of us should want. Now that it’s the Senate’s time to fulfill its duty, my final question is: Will a majority of senators pursue the truth over all else?
Create an account or log in to leave a reply
You need to be a member in order to leave a reply.
Page 1 of 1
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
» Wife Accused of Stabbing Husband After Finding Photos of Him Having Sex With ‘Another’ Woman — Without Realizing That Was Herself
» DOJ Has Identified 400 Suspects, Charged 135 in Capitol Riot
» FBI Capitol Riot Investigation Shifts Gears
» NBCU’s Peacock Pins WWE Network Exclusive U.S. Streaming Rights
» Suspect Arrested in Indianapolis Shooting That Left 5 People and an Unborn Child Dead
» Free Byte Weekend
» How are you feeling right now?
» Last thing you ate/drank
» A Tale of Two Farewells
» A Tale of Two Farewells
» Trump Plans Farewell ‘Ceremony’ On Morning Of Biden’s Inauguration, McConnell Gives GOP Senators Permission To Find Donald Trump Guilty
» Pence. Kushner. McEnany. Ingraham. Even Giuliani… Here Are All People Trump Now Reportedly Feels Have Betrayed Him
» What are your plans for the day
» A House Majority Votes to Impeach Trump
» Glenn Beck Compares Twitter Bans to the Holocaust: ‘This Is the Digital Ghetto’
» Scathing Lincoln Project Ad Blasts Ted Cruz, Josh Hawley for Capitol Riot: 'This Is Your Coup'
» GOP Ignored Their Own Warnings About Trump (VIDEO)
» ‘Our President Wants Us Here’: The Mob That Stormed The Capitol
» Chaos ERUPTS As The White House Staff FOOLS Trump Over The Mob 'He Was Delighted'
» This Republican Senator Is Apparently Totally Unfamiliar With Donald Trump
» House Democrats Introduce Article of Impeachment Against Trump
» A Response From a Former California Governor
» The U.S. Capitol Attack Has Left An Indelible Mark On Our National Security
» The Day America Realized How Dangerous Donald Trump Is
» Congress Confirms Biden's Win After Pro-Trump Mob's Assault on Capitol
» Calls for Trump to Resign or be Removed Grow After Capitol Hill Chaos
» Lindsay Graham Makes Exasperated Plea To Colleagues To End It and Certify the Vote
» Eric Trump Warns of Primary Challenges For Republicans Who Don't Object to Election Results
» Jacob Blake Shooting: No Charges Against Officer in Kenosha, Wisconsin
» Kinzinger: Republicans Can't With 'Clean Conscience' Object After Hearing Trump Tape
» All 10 Living Former Defense Secretaries Declare Election is Over in Forceful Public Letter
» Head-On Crash Kills 7 Kids, 2 Adults in California
» In Extraordinary Hour-Long Call, Trump Pressures Georgia Secretary of State to Recalculate the Vote in His Favor
» One Dead, Several Injured in Texas Church Shooting
» Cruz, Cadre of Other GOP Senators Vow Not to Certify Biden Win Without Probe of Baseless Voter Fraud Claims
» Second Stimulus Check
» ‘Wonder Woman 1984’ Reviews: What the Critics Are Saying
» Nashville Bomber Told His Neighbor Before Attack: The World is 'Never Going to Forget Me'
» Leading New Texas Rebellion, Louie Gohmert Sues Mike Pence Because VP Lacks Authority to Overturn Joe Biden’s Election Win
» Treasury, White House Face Enormous Pressure To Quickly Disburse Stimulus Aid After Trump’s Delay
» CNN's Jake Tapper And The White House's Kayleigh McEnany Spar After He Says She 'Lies The Way Most People Breathe'
» Good News About the Coronavirus Vaccine Is Becoming Contagious
» Nashville Explosion Appears Intentional, RV Played Warning Message of Bomb
» Trump Calls COVID Relief Bill Unsuitable and Demands Congress Add Bigger Stimulus Payments
» Voice of Jeopardy! Johnny Gilbert Remembers Alex Trebek: 'Part of Me Left When Alex Left'
» A Flashback Changes This Edition of Free Byte
» December Is Shaping Up To Be The COVID Pandemic's Deadliest Month Yet In The U.S.
» Four Dead As Winter Storm Hits Northeast With 3 Feet Of Snow
» George W. Bush Sends Christmas Card With Pointed Message As Trump Contests Election
» Stimulus Checks Part of Looming COVID-19 Relief Deal as Congress Finalizes Negotiations
» Biden Working With Team to Decide When to Get Coronavirus Vaccine
» UK could override parts of Brexit deal
» CNN's Jake Tapper Thanks Trump For 'Exposing' Republicans Who Supported Texas' 'Un-Democratic, Un-American, Mendacious Joke of a Lawsuit'
» Does Donald Trump Really Believe He Lost The Election?
» The Trump Team Throws in the Towel on Proving Voter Fraud
» What was the last movie you saw?
» MLB Umpire Brian O’Nora Reportedly Arrested in Sex Sting Operation
» 17 Republican Attorneys General Back Trump in Far-Fetched Election Lawsuit
» 'If I lost, I'd be a very gracious loser'
» Barr Says He Hasn’t Seen Fraud That Could Affect the Election Outcome
» Kim Jong-Un Is Reportedly Displaying 'Excessive Anger' Over the Economic Impact of the Coronavirus Pandemic, Ordering the Execution of Two People
» AstraZeneca Faces Difficult Questions About Its Vaccine After Admitting Mistake
» Trump Has Set a Hidden Trap For Biden. It Could Do Great Damage.
» A Trump 2024 Run Is a Terrible Idea—For Him And For The GOP
» Armenians Return to Nagorno-Karabakh After Cease-Fire
» Georgia and Michigan Deliver Blows to Trump’s Efforts to Undo the Election
» US Announces Further Drawdown of Troops in Afghanistan and Iraq Before Biden Takes Office
» Why Moderna's COVID Vaccine Has a 'Huge Advantage' Over Pfizer's
» U.S. Passes 11 Million Coronavirus Cases as Washington State Orders New Restrictions
» Trump Loses String of Election Results Lawsuits
» Alex Trebek, Quintessential Quizmaster as ‘Jeopardy!’ Host For Three Decades, Dies at 80
» MTV and Nick Cannon Inch Closer to ‘Wild ‘N Out’ Revival
» Trump May Accept Results But Never Concede, Aides Say
» Progressives’ Wish List for Biden Starts With Warren and Sanders
» Fauci Optimistic About COVID-19 Vaccine, Says High-Risk Could Get it in December
» Joe Biden Is Right: It Is Time To Move On
» World Leaders Welcome Biden Win, Seek Reset in U.S. Ties
» George Stephanopoulos Says He Has Only Slept for 14 Hours Since Election Day
» Biden Wins White House, Vowing New Direction For Divided US
» Polls Show Biden gaining ground in Texas, Georgia
» America's New Power Couple: Joe and Mitch
» Trump Hits Election Integrity With Unsupported Complaints
» Judge Rejects Moving Trial of Ex-Officers in Floyd’s Death
» Bernie Sanders’s Election-Night Predictions Were Eerily Correct: ‘He Called It WORD For WORD’
» NO WINNER YET. Key Battleground States Have Votes Yet To Be Counted.
» Jeannie Mai Hospitalized, Forced to Leave 'Dancing With the Stars'
» John Oliver Reminds Voters of All Trump's 'Massive F--- Ups' In Handling The Coronavirus
» Seven Big Things Biden Got Right
» How Are Americans Catching the Virus? Increasingly, ‘They Have No Idea’