Bethea's Byte Reloaded
NFL Broadcasts Promised ‘Unity’ Without Politics, But Some Players Didn’t Stick to the Script Hizmr
Welcome to Bethea's Byte. If you are a member, please sign in and participate. If you are not a member, please sign up and join the conversation. We'd love to hear from you.
Bethea's Byte Reloaded
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
Log in

I forgot my password

    Who is online?
    In total there are 4 users online :: 1 Registered, 0 Hidden and 3 Guests

    The Last Outlaw

    [ View the whole list ]

    Most users ever online was 156 on Wed Jul 03, 2019 11:22 am
    Recent Members
    See more
    We have 40 registered users
    The newest registered user is Ben E

    Our users have posted a total of 4278 messages in 2013 subjects
    November 2022

    Calendar Calendar

    Affiliate With Bethea’s Byte

    Bethea's Byte

    Anti-Spam Bots!

    Submit Your Site To The Web's Top 50 Search Engines for Free!

    The Coffee House

    Planet Nexus

    BG Music

    NFL Broadcasts Promised ‘Unity’ Without Politics, But Some Players Didn’t Stick to the Script

    View previous topic View next topic Go down

    The Last Outlaw
    The Last Outlaw
    Head Administrator
    Head Administrator
    Location : Salem, Oregon
    Gender : Male
    Posts : 2845 Zodiac Sign : Aquarius Age : 46 Birthday : 1976-02-07
    Join date : 2018-05-25
    Status :

    PostThe Last Outlaw Mon Sep 14, 2020 1:41 pm

    NFL Broadcasts Promised ‘Unity’ Without Politics, But Some Players Didn’t Stick to the Script F5cwd

    NFL Broadcasts Promised ‘Unity’ Without Politics, But Some Players Didn’t Stick to the Script FACyn

    Ben Strauss of The Washington Post

    The NFL is back, sidestepping the coronavirus pandemic to reemerge as America’s most popular TV series, complete with a Brady-Gronk reunion and another season of the Lamar Jackson show. But if the football brought a sense of the familiar, the league on display didn’t look or sound quite the same.

    NFL Broadcasts Promised ‘Unity’ Without Politics, But Some Players Didn’t Stick to the Script BB190Ung

    Four years after the NFL distanced itself from Colin Kaepernick’s protest, and on the heels of an offseason that saw players speaking out about police brutality and racial inequality, the league and its broadcast partners did all they could to show that the NFL will embrace dialogue with its players and fans about race and racism, while also offering newfound contrition.

    There was also an effort to couch this newfound image in strictly apolitical terms, though some players had other ideas.

    Sunday began with montages aplenty during the pregame shows. San Francisco 49ers defensive back Richard Sherman voiced an essay that played over images of Black Lives Matter protests on ESPN. On Fox, another essay made the connection between the knee Kaepernick took, reigniting a decades-old debate about athletes as activists, to the knee of the Minneapolis police officer that killed George Floyd.

    As Sunday’s games kicked off, broadcasters across every network described players staying in the locker room during the national anthem — supported, this time, by the league — and cameras panned to find players kneeling or with arms linked during not just one national anthem but a second, Lift Every Voice and Sing, known as the Black national anthem.

    The networks, ultimately, are messengers for the league’s values, which is why, in the decades since 9/11, the telecasts favored flyovers and field-sized American flags. There was, unsurprisingly, a distinct new flavor this past week, with similar themes emerging on every broadcast.

    It began the night before the season kicked off, with NFL Media producing a prime-time special that aired on NBC. Entitled Inspire Change, it included host Mike Tirico interviewing both NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell and NFL Players Association President DeMaurice Smith. The first question was for Goodell, about how he has changed in the four years since Kaepernick first took a knee.

    “All of us went through a process of learning to try to understand what our players were protesting,” Goodell said. “Colin and Eric Reid and Kenny Stills and so many other players who were trying to bring attention to what’s going on in their communities and our communities and we’re seeing that play out now on screens in front of us and it’s been going on for decades if not longer.”

    Goodell continued: “For us, it was just understanding what their focus was and then also, beyond, just the attention that wanted to be brought to it but how do we help and support them make the change in their communities?”

    Reid and Kaepernick, who called the NFL’s social justice gestures “propaganda,” would almost certainly take exception to that explanation. But the sentiment was echoed on Fox’s Sunday pregame show, by Howie Long.

    “Four years ago, most folks across the country missed the message and maybe the meaning when Colin Kaepernick took a knee,” Long said. “I’m a guy who played 13 years in the NFL, in locker rooms that were predominantly Black, which gave me what I thought was a unique perspective that most white people don’t get. I’m embarrassed to say that the very first time Colin took a knee I wondered why during the national anthem because for someone who looks like me this is the greatest country on earth. But for the last 400 years that hasn’t been the reality for Black Americans.”

    If explaining changing attitudes was a common thread, so was the effort to tell viewers explicitly what the ongoing protests were about, and not about — an attempt to survive the tightrope of supporting players while not alienating some fans. According to a recent Washington Post poll, a 56 percent majority of Americans say athletes kneeling during the national anthem to protest racial inequality is appropriate. That’s up from a few years ago, but still leaves a large share who disagree.

    NBC’s Tony Dungy: “This isn’t about the flag; it’s not about Black and White. It’s about making our country a better place to live.”

    Fox’s Curt Menefee: “The one thing that got misconstrued before, the kneeling, why are you protesting during the national anthem? First of all the players aren’t protesting the national anthem. They’re demonstrating during the national anthem. What they’re protesting is what’s off the field — police brutality, social injustice."

    The easiest way to describe the aims of the movement, several commentators settled on, was the fairly anodyne “unity.”

    On NBC's Thursday night telecast, Al Michaels said, “It boils down to unity and equality."

    On Sunday morning on CBS’s pregame show, Boomer Esiason said, "That’s the key word: It is about unity.”

    To which Phil Simms responded: “You know, Boomer, you said a great word: unified. I think that’s what the players want to be. They want to be unified.”

    Of course, any pledge of unity was quickly undermined when fans in Kansas City booed the Houston Texans and the Chiefs as they lined up together for their pregame “moment of unity.” (To his credit, CBS host James Brown noted the booing on Sunday.)

    Goodell and network executives, wary of the partisan divisions that remain around athlete protest, also insisted their newfound focus on social justice was apolitical. “We’re not here to make political statements,” Goodell told Tirico Wednesday night. ESPN executive Stephanie Druley said on a conference call last week, “We don’t see the social justice movement as being political.”

    The consistency of the messaging aside, some players appeared comfortable pushing back. On Thursday, before the season even kicked off, the Miami Dolphins released a video that called such pronouncements into question. “This attempt to unify only creates more divide. So we’ll skip the song and dance. And as a team we’ll stay inside,” players said, adding, “No more fluff and empty gestures.”

    And on Sunday, when CBS’s Nate Burleson conducted an interview with the Baltimore Ravens’ Calais Campbell, they discussed his team’s letter to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), urging the passing of the George Floyd Justice in Policing Act.

    A player talking about specific, and divisive, legislation, while lobbying a politician, is decidedly not apolitical. Which perhaps explains why, as persistent as the “unity” messaging was, there was also a distinct appeal to get on with the football. Nowhere was that more evident than when Cris Collinsworth, on NBC, welcomed viewers to the season’s opening game with a remark that was either out of touch or an apt summation of how some football fans felt.

    “I’m going to announce this football game,” Collinsworth said. "But I feel like I have to start off by saying something: I stand behind these players 100 percent. 100 percent. What they are trying to do is create positive change in this country that, frankly, is long, long overdue. So let’s get that out of the way and go call a football game.”

    NFL Broadcasts Promised ‘Unity’ Without Politics, But Some Players Didn’t Stick to the Script Ro5An
    NFL Broadcasts Promised ‘Unity’ Without Politics, But Some Players Didn’t Stick to the Script JkIk6NFL Broadcasts Promised ‘Unity’ Without Politics, But Some Players Didn’t Stick to the Script JkfCd

    UFC Fight Night 192: Smith vs. Spann

    View previous topic View next topic Back to top

    Create an account or log in to leave a reply

    You need to be a member in order to leave a reply.

    Create an account

    Join our community by creating a new account. It's easy!

    Create a new account

    Log in

    Already have an account? No problem, log in here.

    Log in

    Permissions in this forum:
    You can reply to topics in this forum