Bethea's Byte
WSJ Editorial Shreds Trump's Afghanistan Claims Hizmr
Welcome to Bethea's Byte. If you are a member, please sign in and participate. If you are not a member, please sign up and join the conversation. We'd love to hear from you.
Bethea's Byte
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
Log in

I forgot my password

    Who is online?
    In total there are 3 users online :: 1 Registered, 0 Hidden and 2 Guests

    The Last Outlaw

    [ View the whole list ]

    Most users ever online was 156 on Wed Jul 03, 2019 11:22 am
    Recent Members
    See more
    We have 40 registered users
    The newest registered user is Ben E

    Our users have posted a total of 3993 messages in 1809 subjects
    July 2022

    Calendar Calendar

    Affiliate With Bethea’s Byte

    Bethea's Byte

    Anti-Spam Bots!

    Submit Your Site To The Web's Top 50 Search Engines for Free!

    The Coffee House

    Planet Nexus

    BG Music

    WSJ Editorial Shreds Trump's Afghanistan Claims

    View previous topic View next topic Go down

    The Last Outlaw
    The Last Outlaw
    Head Administrator
    Head Administrator
    Location : Salem, Oregon
    Gender : Male
    Posts : 2617 Zodiac Sign : Aquarius Age : 46 Birthday : 1976-02-07
    Join date : 2018-05-25
    Status :

    PostThe Last Outlaw Fri Jan 04, 2019 2:47 pm

    WSJ Editorial Shreds Trump's Afghanistan Claims I6ke0

    From Politico

    Caitlin Oprysko of Politico wrote:
    WSJ Editorial Shreds Trump's Afghanistan Claims BBRNFrH

    A Wall Street Journal editorial published Friday ripped into President Donald Trump for comments he made about the Soviet Union's decade long war in Afghanistan, blasting his “reprehensible” recollection of the conflict and his “slander” of U.S. allies.

    The editorial referred to comments made by Trump during a meandering 90-minute meeting of his Cabinet on Wednesday, where Trump belittled the role of U.S. allies in the Middle East, accusing them of sending minimal resources to back up U.S. troops in comparison with the American presence there.

    “What other countries have done for the last long period of time is give us some soldiers and then talk about it like it’s the end of the world, and we’re subsidizing their militaries by billions and billions and billions of dollars,” Trump said, claiming the efforts were meant to appease previous U.S. presidents so they could say American allies were fighting alongside the U.S. in an increasingly unpopular war.

    “This mockery is a slander against every ally that has supported the U.S. effort in Afghanistan with troops who fought and often died,” the Journal's editorial said, citing the more than 450 British soldiers who have been killed there.

    Just as "reprehensible," the Journal's editorial board noted, "was Mr. Trump’s utterly false narrative of the Soviet Union’s involvement" in Afghanistan.

    In Wednesday’s meeting, Trump made the bizarre claim that in 1979, “the reason Russia was in Afghanistan was because terrorists were going into Russia,” positing that the Soviet Union’s involvement in Afghanistan was a major reason for its collapse.

    Trump’s retelling of the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan has been strongly disputed by historians, who say the invasion was an attempt to prop up the communist regime and compete with the U.S. in the region. But the Journal’s editorial board was especially peeved by Trump’s assertion that Russia was "right to be there" in Afghanistan, a statement that breaks with the long-standing U.S. government view of the Soviet invasion.

    “We cannot recall a more absurd misstatement of history by an American President,” they wrote.

    The Journal, which is owned by Trump ally Rupert Murdoch, has been occasionally critical of the president for his remarks in the past. But the right-leaning editorial board has rarely taken such eviscerating shots at the president, whose “cracked history” they wrote “can’t alter that reality” of the Soviet war in Afghanistan.

    Trump's view of history is always opposite of what's really going on.  Cracked view?  Yes!  Altered reality?  You better believe it.

    Just saying.
    WSJ Editorial Shreds Trump's Afghanistan Claims I6goy

    WSJ Editorial Shreds Trump's Afghanistan Claims Ro5An
    WSJ Editorial Shreds Trump's Afghanistan Claims RhD4cWSJ Editorial Shreds Trump's Afghanistan Claims RhfbI

    UFC Fight Night 192: Smith vs. Spann

    View previous topic View next topic Back to top

    Create an account or log in to leave a reply

    You need to be a member in order to leave a reply.

    Create an account

    Join our community by creating a new account. It's easy!

    Create a new account

    Log in

    Already have an account? No problem, log in here.

    Log in

    Permissions in this forum:
    You cannot reply to topics in this forum