Bethea's Byte
Chanting ‘Lock Him Up’ at a Lawless President is Good for Democracy D5FRa
Welcome to Bethea's Byte. If you are a member, please sign in and participate. If you are not a member, please sign up and join the conversation. We'd love to hear from you.
Bethea's Byte
Chanting ‘Lock Him Up’ at a Lawless President is Good for Democracy D5FRa
Welcome to Bethea's Byte. If you are a member, please sign in and participate. If you are not a member, please sign up and join the conversation. We'd love to hear from you.
Bethea's Byte
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
WELCOME TO YOUR HOME FOR NEWS, OPINIONS, DEBATES & YOUR VOICE -- BETHEA'S BYTE
Welcome guests and members to the home for News, Opinions, Debates and Your Voice... Bethea's Byte. To all guests of this site, please feel free to look things over, but you are encouraged to register and take part in discussing all news reports posted here. You are also encouraged, as a member to post your own news stories. We would love to have discussions on your news reports as well. You are further encouraged to debate these stories as well, especially in the political areas. All I ask is that no matter what side you're on, keep the debates civil. If you are joining us from another forum, we ask you to affiliate with us. We are more than happy to check you out, join your site and participate with you as well. Once again, you are welcome here at Bethea's Byte. Join in the conversation. Spark a discussion. Have a passionate debate. Most importantly, Let your voice be heard! BYTE THIS!
Log in

I forgot my password

Notifications
    Who is online?
    In total there are 2 users online :: 1 Registered, 0 Hidden and 1 Guest :: 1 Bot

    The Last Outlaw

    [ View the whole list ]


    Most users ever online was 156 on Wed Jul 03, 2019 11:22 am
    Statistics
    We have 33 registered users
    The newest registered user is GamrNrd

    Our users have posted a total of 4221 messages in 1729 subjects
    Latest topics
    » What are your plans for the day
    Chanting ‘Lock Him Up’ at a Lawless President is Good for Democracy Clock-10Today at 9:34 am by Naiwen

    » Here's How Long Derek Chauvin Could Spend in Prison
    Chanting ‘Lock Him Up’ at a Lawless President is Good for Democracy Clock-10Tue Apr 20, 2021 8:37 pm by The Last Outlaw

    » Derek Chauvin Convicted of Murder and Manslaughter in George Floyd's Death
    Chanting ‘Lock Him Up’ at a Lawless President is Good for Democracy Clock-10Tue Apr 20, 2021 5:55 pm by The Last Outlaw

    » 'Wheel of Fortune' Fans Call For Rule Change After Contestant Loses on Minor Technicality
    Chanting ‘Lock Him Up’ at a Lawless President is Good for Democracy Clock-10Thu Apr 08, 2021 3:12 pm by The Last Outlaw

    » Fla. Teacher Who Presented Herself as 'Mother Figure' Accused of Sexually Abusing Student for Years
    Chanting ‘Lock Him Up’ at a Lawless President is Good for Democracy Clock-10Fri Apr 02, 2021 4:15 pm by The Last Outlaw

    » Derek Chauvin Trial: MMA Fighter Who Watched George Floyd's Death Says He Called Police on the Police
    Chanting ‘Lock Him Up’ at a Lawless President is Good for Democracy Clock-10Tue Mar 30, 2021 10:36 am by The Last Outlaw

    » Gun Laws and Stats
    Chanting ‘Lock Him Up’ at a Lawless President is Good for Democracy Clock-10Mon Mar 29, 2021 4:11 pm by The Last Outlaw

    » Floyd Family Kneels Outside Courthouse in Symbolic Statement
    Chanting ‘Lock Him Up’ at a Lawless President is Good for Democracy Clock-10Mon Mar 29, 2021 8:58 am by The Last Outlaw

    » Boulder Shooting: Multiple Injuries, Residents Take Shelter as Police Look For Gunman
    Chanting ‘Lock Him Up’ at a Lawless President is Good for Democracy Clock-10Tue Mar 23, 2021 11:28 am by The Last Outlaw

    » Person of Interest in the Deaths of 5 People, Including Ex-Wife, Allegedly Admits to Murdering 16
    Chanting ‘Lock Him Up’ at a Lawless President is Good for Democracy Clock-10Mon Mar 22, 2021 7:53 pm by The Last Outlaw

    » If You Haven’t Received Your 3rd Stimulus Check Yet, Here’s Why Wednesday Matters
    Chanting ‘Lock Him Up’ at a Lawless President is Good for Democracy Clock-10Mon Mar 22, 2021 6:17 pm by The Last Outlaw

    » Free Byte: What Grinds My Gears? Cancel Culture
    Chanting ‘Lock Him Up’ at a Lawless President is Good for Democracy Clock-10Sun Mar 21, 2021 5:42 pm by Kyng

    » Tennessee Sister and Brother Charged with First-Degree Murder in the Death of Their Disabled Mother
    Chanting ‘Lock Him Up’ at a Lawless President is Good for Democracy Clock-10Sun Mar 21, 2021 5:37 pm by The Last Outlaw

    » Spa Shooting Victims ID'd As Biden, Harris Head To Atlanta
    Chanting ‘Lock Him Up’ at a Lawless President is Good for Democracy Clock-10Fri Mar 19, 2021 12:18 pm by The Last Outlaw

    » Food and more!
    Chanting ‘Lock Him Up’ at a Lawless President is Good for Democracy Clock-10Wed Mar 17, 2021 10:49 am by Naiwen

    » Michelle Obama Responds to Meghan Markle and Prince Harry's Oprah Winfrey Interview
    Chanting ‘Lock Him Up’ at a Lawless President is Good for Democracy Clock-10Tue Mar 16, 2021 10:11 am by The Last Outlaw

    » Queen Elizabeth Says Saddened by Harry and Meghan's Experiences
    Chanting ‘Lock Him Up’ at a Lawless President is Good for Democracy Clock-10Sun Mar 14, 2021 3:53 pm by The Last Outlaw

    » Suicide Prevention
    Chanting ‘Lock Him Up’ at a Lawless President is Good for Democracy Clock-10Sat Mar 13, 2021 11:09 pm by The Last Outlaw

    » Jury Selection in Derek Chauvin Case Starts Despite Prosecutors Wanting to Halt Trial
    Chanting ‘Lock Him Up’ at a Lawless President is Good for Democracy Clock-10Tue Mar 09, 2021 9:35 am by The Last Outlaw

    » House Progressives Back Revised COVID-19 Aid Bill as Vote Nears
    Chanting ‘Lock Him Up’ at a Lawless President is Good for Democracy Clock-10Mon Mar 08, 2021 3:49 pm by The Last Outlaw

    May 2021
    SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
          1
    2345678
    9101112131415
    16171819202122
    23242526272829
    3031     

    Calendar Calendar

    CBOX
    Affiliate With Bethea’s Byte


    Bethea's Byte

    Anti-Spam Bots!

    Submit Your Site To The Web's Top 50 Search Engines for Free!






    The Coffee House


    Planet Nexus





    IconSkouliki

    Chanting ‘Lock Him Up’ at a Lawless President is Good for Democracy

    View previous topic View next topic Go down

    The Last Outlaw
    The Last Outlaw
    Male Posts : 1739
    Age : 45
    Join date : 2018-05-25
    Location : Salem, Oregon
    Status :
    Online
    Offline

    http://betheasbyte.com/forum

    PostThe Last Outlaw Tue Oct 29, 2019 3:55 pm

    Chanting ‘Lock Him Up’ at a Lawless President is Good for Democracy Qsc05

    The opinions in this article are the author’s, as published by our content partner, and do not necessarily represent the views of Bethea's Byte

    From Eric Levitz to The Daily Intelligencer

    Chanting ‘Lock Him Up’ at a Lawless President is Good for Democracy $

    On Friday, Donald Trump’s White House admitted it had overseen 1,556 more family separations than previously acknowledged. Of these, more than 1,000 were carried out after a federal court had ordered the administration to keep migrant families intact. The total number of asylum-seeking families broken up by our government now sits at approximately 5,500. Many of these parents and children have yet to reunite. Some never will.

    Two days after this disclosure, the president attended a baseball game. When his image flashed above the outfield in Nationals Park, the crowd’s cheers turned into boos, which then — in some sections of the stadium — turned into chants of “Lock him up.”

    On cable news Monday morning, one of these developments registered as an attack on American ideals so obscene, it demanded bipartisan condemnation; the other, a banal event that scarcely merited a mention.

    “Even at a time when there is a lot that our president does that I find disturbing, offensive, unconventional, I have a hard time with the idea of a crowd — on a globally televised sporting event — chanting ‘lock him up’ about our president,” Democratic senator Chris Coons said on CNN. “I frankly think the office of the president deserves respect, even when the actions of our president at times don’t.”



    MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough and Mika Brzezinski, meanwhile, decried the crowd’s chant as “un-American” and “fascist.” “We are Americans, and we do not do that,” Scarborough said, upbraiding the Nationals’ faithful in the tone of a father who is less angry than disappointed. “We do not want the world hearing us chant ‘Lock him up’ to this president or to any president … [as though] you’re going to actually imprison your political opponents.”

    Many of Twitter’s self-styled defenders of democratic norms echoed this assessment. “Publicly calling for your political opponents to be jailed without due process is an authoritarian strategy even when liberals do it,” George Mason University political scientist Jennifer Victor explained. “Of course, it’s much worse to hear it from elected leaders than spontaneously from an unprompted crowd, but still. This is #polarization.”

    It is, of course, understandable that commentators would devote less attention Monday to a days-old development in the family-separation saga than to a World Series crowd calling for the president’s imprisonment. What’s harder to comprehend, in my view, is how Coons & Co. can reconcile their vehement denunciations of the latter with the bare facts of the former — let alone with the broader context of presidential lawlessness from which those 1,000 extralegal family separations emerged.

    Take Victor’s assertion that the Nationals crowd was calling for its “political opponents to be jailed without due process.” Ignore, for the moment, the false equivalency embedded in this phrasing (which casts Trump and booing Nationals fans as a pair of “political opponents,” rather than as a head of state and constituents subject to his authority). On what basis does Victor interpret the crowd’s chant as a call for the suspension of the rule of law, rather than as a demand for its reassertion?

    When thousands of South Koreans took to the streets in 2016 “publicly calling” for the arrest of their corrupt president, few political scientists decried their dissent as an authoritarian assault on due process. When thousands of Venezuelans shouted similar demands in Caracas last year, U.S. lawmakers celebrated their democratic spirit. In these contexts, our political class has little difficulty understanding that calls for a lawless leader to face legal consequences are the opposite of authoritarian — or that mass dissent can serve as a backstop for democracy when presidents immunize themselves from formal systems of accountability.

    By the time Trump’s face appeared onscreen in Nationals Park Sunday, the president had:

    • Stated publicly, and repeatedly, that he believes the U.S. attorney general’s first responsibility is to “protect” him from legal scrutiny.

    • Fired and replaced the leadership of the FBI and DOJ for displaying insufficient personal loyalty to him.

    • Intervened in a federal investigation in ways that a prosecutor could potentially consider obstruction of justice, according to the findings of special counsel Robert Mueller’s probe.

    • Publicly argued that he has an absolute right to coerce foreign governments into launching investigations of his political opponents.

    • Withheld congressionally approved military aid to a U.S. ally under attack so as to coerce the Ukrainian government into launching an investigation of the Democratic Party’s 2020 front-runner, according to the sworn testimony of multiple administration officials.

    • Ordered his subordinates to turn away any and all asylum-seekers at the southern border, in defiance of federal and international law — while promising those subordinates he would use his pardon power to insulate those who carried out his lawless directives from the threat of legal accountability, according to the New York Times.

    • Fired and replaced the DHS officials who most vocally resisted his extralegal demands.

    In other words: The president has publicly declared his contempt for the rule of law and attempted to subvert it in myriad ways — including ones that threaten to insulate him from the threat of legal or even electoral accountability.

    Meanwhile, an executive-branch agency has unilaterally declared that a sitting president is immune from federal law as long as he or she remains in office. Thus the only immediate constraint on our avowedly tyrannical president’s authority is the threat of impeachment and removal — which, given the composition of the Senate, strikes most political observers as no constraint at all.

    In this context, is a “Lock him up” chant really a more harrowing sign of creeping authoritarianism than a display of polite tolerance for the tyrant-in-chief would be? The former involves citizens ironically repurposing their abusive leader’s own demagoguery to protest his lawlessness. The latter assures that leader that he is not only above the law but also immune from social sanction.

    To conclude that the “Lock him up” chant was an affront to democratic values rather than an expression of them, Victor and Scarborough must ignore most of the relevant context, impute the darkest possible intention to the chanters, and wildly misconstrue their relationship with Trump. Nationals fans are not the president’s political opponents; they are his constituents. And their conflict is not rooted (solely) in disagreements about policies and values; Trump enjoys extraordinary power over the chanters’ lives, a power he routinely abuses, in Victor’s and Scarborough’s own estimations.

    A stronger version of the anti-chant argument would focus on its potential consequences, rather than its moral character: Chanting “Lock him up” at Trump may be a worthy expression of democratic dissent in the abstract, but in our hyperpolarized polity, it risks eroding norms of partisan toleration and emboldening the reactionary right.

    And yet, while this argument at least does not require misrepresenting Sunday night’s events, it rests more on faith than evidence. After all, what in the past three years (or past two decades) of American politics suggests that the center-left’s good faith and performative respect for institutional traditions will constrain the right’s illiberalism and abuses of power? (Did Nancy Pelosi’s painstakingly slow, deliberate approach to impeachment prevent Republicans from casting her inquiry as a “Soviet-style witch hunt?” Did Barack Obama’s refusal to publicly disclose the FBI’s investigation into the Trump campaign before Election Day 2016 prevent Republican leaders from accusing him of orchestrating that investigation for electoral purposes?)

    The indiscriminate “respect for the office of the president” that Coons counsels has done little to arrest our republic’s descent into lawlessness. If anything, it has hastened that regression: What, other than such “respect,” enabled the DOJ to insist, without controversy, that Donald Trump can’t be held legally accountable for federal crimes until he leaves office? Or the Obama administration to insist, with self-righteousness, that George W. Bush must not be held legally accountable for his abuses of power upon returning to private life?

    Americans did not win their republic by respecting the offices of tyrants (whether those tyrants occupied the throne in 18th-century London or the plantations of 19th-century Richmond). We’ll need a little less reflexive deference to decorum — and a little more “Nattitude” — if we wish to keep it.

    _________________
    Chanting ‘Lock Him Up’ at a Lawless President is Good for Democracy FBCTRChanting ‘Lock Him Up’ at a Lawless President is Good for Democracy D5SsG
    Chanting ‘Lock Him Up’ at a Lawless President is Good for Democracy Nexads420
    Kyng
    Posts : 531
    Join date : 2018-05-30
    Status :
    Online
    Offline

    PostKyng Tue Oct 29, 2019 4:27 pm

    As much as I don't like the guy... I don't see how these chants are "good for democracy", or even why 'democracy' should be the goal in this instance.

    The decision to lock someone up is not something that should be put to a vote among the general public. It needs to be made by judges and jurors who have heard from witnesses and examined and reviewed the available evidence. In my opinion, "Trial by popular opinion" is dangerous, and it's not something that has any place in a free country.

    Not to mention, it's descending to Trump's level, and it's horrible for political discourse, which is damaged enough as it is >_< .
    The Last Outlaw
    The Last Outlaw
    Male Posts : 1739
    Age : 45
    Join date : 2018-05-25
    Location : Salem, Oregon
    Status :
    Online
    Offline

    http://betheasbyte.com/forum

    PostThe Last Outlaw Tue Oct 29, 2019 9:19 pm

    @Kyng wrote:As much as I don't like the guy... I don't see how these chants are "good for democracy", or even why 'democracy' should be the goal in this instance.

    The decision to lock someone up is not something that should be put to a vote among the general public. It needs to be made by judges and jurors who have heard from witnesses and examined and reviewed the available evidence. In my opinion, "Trial by popular opinion" is dangerous, and it's not something that has any place in a free country.

    Not to mention, it's descending to Trump's level, and it's horrible for political discourse, which is damaged enough as it is >_< .

    So I guess it's OK when South Korea does it.

    I guess it's OK when Venezuela does it and our lawmakers can celebrate their democratic spirit

    But let us do it, and we are dead wrong? Did I miss something here??

    _________________
    Chanting ‘Lock Him Up’ at a Lawless President is Good for Democracy FBCTRChanting ‘Lock Him Up’ at a Lawless President is Good for Democracy D5SsG
    Chanting ‘Lock Him Up’ at a Lawless President is Good for Democracy Nexads420

    View previous topic View next topic Back to top

    Create an account or log in to leave a reply

    You need to be a member in order to leave a reply.

    Create an account

    Join our community by creating a new account. It's easy!


    Create a new account

    Log in

    Already have an account? No problem, log in here.


    Log in

     
    Permissions in this forum:
    You cannot reply to topics in this forum