Bethea's Byte
Chanting ‘Lock Him Up’ at a Lawless President is Good for Democracy D5FRa
Welcome to Bethea's Byte. If you are a member, please sign in and participate. If you are not a member, please sign up and join the conversation. We'd love to hear from you.
Bethea's Byte
Chanting ‘Lock Him Up’ at a Lawless President is Good for Democracy D5FRa
Welcome to Bethea's Byte. If you are a member, please sign in and participate. If you are not a member, please sign up and join the conversation. We'd love to hear from you.
Bethea's Byte
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
Announcements
WELCOME TO YOUR HOME FOR...
NEWS, OPINIONS, DEBATES and YOUR VOICE
BETHEA'S BYTE
BYTE THIS!
Police: Slain Instagram Star's Husband Kills Self in Florida. [X]
Fitness Influencer Cashawn "Cookie" Sims Goes Missing in Los Angeles. [X]
Ahmaud Arbery Murder Suspects Seek to Ban Confederate Flag License Plate From Evidence. [X]
TV Anchor, Meteorologists Quit Over Vaccine Mandate. [X]
DEVELOPING STORY: Suspicious Vehicle Near Supreme Court. Man in Custody, According to Police.[X]
Trump Says He Has a Mouth That Tells The Truth While Making False Statements at Georgia Rally. [X]
Jan. 6 Trials Slowed By Mounting Evidence in U.S. Capitol Riot. [X]
R. Kelly is Found Guilty of Racketeering and Eight Counts of Sex Trafficking. [X]
Employee Shot Dead at Hospital, Suspect Injures Two Officers Before Capture. [X]
Log in

I forgot my password

Notifications
    Who is online?
    In total there are 5 users online :: 1 Registered, 0 Hidden and 4 Guests

    The Last Outlaw

    [ View the whole list ]


    Most users ever online was 156 on Wed Jul 03, 2019 11:22 am
    Statistics
    We have 34 registered users
    The newest registered user is Luke The Lad

    Our users have posted a total of 4434 messages in 1827 subjects
    Latest topics
    » 2021-2022 NFL Schedule -- Week 8
    Chanting ‘Lock Him Up’ at a Lawless President is Good for Democracy Clock-10Yesterday at 1:22 pm by The Last Outlaw

    » Biden Blocks Second Trump Bid to Withhold More Jan. 6 Documents
    Chanting ‘Lock Him Up’ at a Lawless President is Good for Democracy Clock-10Yesterday at 1:03 pm by The Last Outlaw

    » Jelani Day's Cause of Death Was Drowning, Coroner Says
    Chanting ‘Lock Him Up’ at a Lawless President is Good for Democracy Clock-10Yesterday at 12:15 pm by The Last Outlaw

    » Last thing you ate/drank
    Chanting ‘Lock Him Up’ at a Lawless President is Good for Democracy Clock-10Mon Oct 25, 2021 10:21 am by The Last Outlaw

    » 2021-2022 NFL Schedule -- Week 7
    Chanting ‘Lock Him Up’ at a Lawless President is Good for Democracy Clock-10Sat Oct 23, 2021 9:06 am by The Last Outlaw

    » 2021-2022 NFL Schedule -- Week 6
    Chanting ‘Lock Him Up’ at a Lawless President is Good for Democracy Clock-10Mon Oct 18, 2021 8:47 pm by The Last Outlaw

    » Trump Faces a Pile of Civil Lawsuits As Depositions Begin
    Chanting ‘Lock Him Up’ at a Lawless President is Good for Democracy Clock-10Mon Oct 18, 2021 12:45 pm by The Last Outlaw

    » Video Released of Woman Found Dead in Police Van
    Chanting ‘Lock Him Up’ at a Lawless President is Good for Democracy Clock-10Mon Oct 18, 2021 11:46 am by The Last Outlaw

    » Colin Powell, Who Shaped U.S. National Security, Dies at 84
    Chanting ‘Lock Him Up’ at a Lawless President is Good for Democracy Clock-10Mon Oct 18, 2021 10:49 am by The Last Outlaw

    » What are your plans for the day
    Chanting ‘Lock Him Up’ at a Lawless President is Good for Democracy Clock-10Fri Oct 15, 2021 4:29 pm by Kyng

    » Off-Duty Female Officer Fatally Shoots Woman After Finding Her With Partner: Police
    Chanting ‘Lock Him Up’ at a Lawless President is Good for Democracy Clock-10Fri Oct 15, 2021 4:23 pm by Kyng

    » Police: Slain Instagram Star's Husband Kills Self in Florida
    Chanting ‘Lock Him Up’ at a Lawless President is Good for Democracy Clock-10Sat Oct 09, 2021 6:39 pm by The Last Outlaw

    » Fitness Influencer Cashawn 'Cookie' Sims Goes Missing in Los Angeles
    Chanting ‘Lock Him Up’ at a Lawless President is Good for Democracy Clock-10Wed Oct 06, 2021 5:33 pm by The Last Outlaw

    » Ahmaud Arbery Murder Suspects Seek to Ban Confederate Flag License Plate From Evidence
    Chanting ‘Lock Him Up’ at a Lawless President is Good for Democracy Clock-10Wed Oct 06, 2021 5:00 pm by The Last Outlaw

    » TV Anchor, Meteorologists Quit Over Vaccine Mandate
    Chanting ‘Lock Him Up’ at a Lawless President is Good for Democracy Clock-10Wed Oct 06, 2021 4:37 pm by The Last Outlaw

    » Suspicious Vehicle Near Supreme Court, Man in Custody: Police
    Chanting ‘Lock Him Up’ at a Lawless President is Good for Democracy Clock-10Tue Oct 05, 2021 8:34 pm by The Last Outlaw

    » 2021-2022 NFL Schedule -- Week 5
    Chanting ‘Lock Him Up’ at a Lawless President is Good for Democracy Clock-10Tue Oct 05, 2021 4:45 pm by The Last Outlaw

    » Employee Shot Dead at Hospital, Suspect Injures 2 Officers Before Capture
    Chanting ‘Lock Him Up’ at a Lawless President is Good for Democracy Clock-10Mon Oct 04, 2021 9:15 am by The Last Outlaw

    » 2021-2022 NFL Schedule -- Week 4
    Chanting ‘Lock Him Up’ at a Lawless President is Good for Democracy Clock-10Sat Oct 02, 2021 12:38 am by The Last Outlaw

    » R. Kelly Is Found Guilty of Racketeering and 8 Counts of Sex Trafficking
    Chanting ‘Lock Him Up’ at a Lawless President is Good for Democracy Clock-10Fri Oct 01, 2021 9:00 pm by The Last Outlaw

    October 2021
    SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
         12
    3456789
    10111213141516
    17181920212223
    24252627282930
    31      

    Calendar Calendar

    Affiliate With Bethea’s Byte


    Bethea's Byte

    Anti-Spam Bots!

    Submit Your Site To The Web's Top 50 Search Engines for Free!






    The Coffee House


    Planet Nexus





    IconSkouliki
    2 posters

    Chanting ‘Lock Him Up’ at a Lawless President is Good for Democracy

    View previous topic View next topic Go down

    The Last Outlaw
    The Last Outlaw
    Male Posts : 1847
    Age : 45
    Join date : 2018-05-25
    Location : Salem, Oregon
    Status :
    Online
    Offline

    http://betheasbyte.com/forum

    PostThe Last Outlaw Tue Oct 29, 2019 3:55 pm

    Chanting ‘Lock Him Up’ at a Lawless President is Good for Democracy Qsc05

    The opinions in this article are the author’s, as published by our content partner, and do not necessarily represent the views of Bethea's Byte

    From Eric Levitz to The Daily Intelligencer

    Chanting ‘Lock Him Up’ at a Lawless President is Good for Democracy $

    On Friday, Donald Trump’s White House admitted it had overseen 1,556 more family separations than previously acknowledged. Of these, more than 1,000 were carried out after a federal court had ordered the administration to keep migrant families intact. The total number of asylum-seeking families broken up by our government now sits at approximately 5,500. Many of these parents and children have yet to reunite. Some never will.

    Two days after this disclosure, the president attended a baseball game. When his image flashed above the outfield in Nationals Park, the crowd’s cheers turned into boos, which then — in some sections of the stadium — turned into chants of “Lock him up.”

    On cable news Monday morning, one of these developments registered as an attack on American ideals so obscene, it demanded bipartisan condemnation; the other, a banal event that scarcely merited a mention.

    “Even at a time when there is a lot that our president does that I find disturbing, offensive, unconventional, I have a hard time with the idea of a crowd — on a globally televised sporting event — chanting ‘lock him up’ about our president,” Democratic senator Chris Coons said on CNN. “I frankly think the office of the president deserves respect, even when the actions of our president at times don’t.”



    MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough and Mika Brzezinski, meanwhile, decried the crowd’s chant as “un-American” and “fascist.” “We are Americans, and we do not do that,” Scarborough said, upbraiding the Nationals’ faithful in the tone of a father who is less angry than disappointed. “We do not want the world hearing us chant ‘Lock him up’ to this president or to any president … [as though] you’re going to actually imprison your political opponents.”

    Many of Twitter’s self-styled defenders of democratic norms echoed this assessment. “Publicly calling for your political opponents to be jailed without due process is an authoritarian strategy even when liberals do it,” George Mason University political scientist Jennifer Victor explained. “Of course, it’s much worse to hear it from elected leaders than spontaneously from an unprompted crowd, but still. This is #polarization.”

    It is, of course, understandable that commentators would devote less attention Monday to a days-old development in the family-separation saga than to a World Series crowd calling for the president’s imprisonment. What’s harder to comprehend, in my view, is how Coons & Co. can reconcile their vehement denunciations of the latter with the bare facts of the former — let alone with the broader context of presidential lawlessness from which those 1,000 extralegal family separations emerged.

    Take Victor’s assertion that the Nationals crowd was calling for its “political opponents to be jailed without due process.” Ignore, for the moment, the false equivalency embedded in this phrasing (which casts Trump and booing Nationals fans as a pair of “political opponents,” rather than as a head of state and constituents subject to his authority). On what basis does Victor interpret the crowd’s chant as a call for the suspension of the rule of law, rather than as a demand for its reassertion?

    When thousands of South Koreans took to the streets in 2016 “publicly calling” for the arrest of their corrupt president, few political scientists decried their dissent as an authoritarian assault on due process. When thousands of Venezuelans shouted similar demands in Caracas last year, U.S. lawmakers celebrated their democratic spirit. In these contexts, our political class has little difficulty understanding that calls for a lawless leader to face legal consequences are the opposite of authoritarian — or that mass dissent can serve as a backstop for democracy when presidents immunize themselves from formal systems of accountability.

    By the time Trump’s face appeared onscreen in Nationals Park Sunday, the president had:

    • Stated publicly, and repeatedly, that he believes the U.S. attorney general’s first responsibility is to “protect” him from legal scrutiny.

    • Fired and replaced the leadership of the FBI and DOJ for displaying insufficient personal loyalty to him.

    • Intervened in a federal investigation in ways that a prosecutor could potentially consider obstruction of justice, according to the findings of special counsel Robert Mueller’s probe.

    • Publicly argued that he has an absolute right to coerce foreign governments into launching investigations of his political opponents.

    • Withheld congressionally approved military aid to a U.S. ally under attack so as to coerce the Ukrainian government into launching an investigation of the Democratic Party’s 2020 front-runner, according to the sworn testimony of multiple administration officials.

    • Ordered his subordinates to turn away any and all asylum-seekers at the southern border, in defiance of federal and international law — while promising those subordinates he would use his pardon power to insulate those who carried out his lawless directives from the threat of legal accountability, according to the New York Times.

    • Fired and replaced the DHS officials who most vocally resisted his extralegal demands.

    In other words: The president has publicly declared his contempt for the rule of law and attempted to subvert it in myriad ways — including ones that threaten to insulate him from the threat of legal or even electoral accountability.

    Meanwhile, an executive-branch agency has unilaterally declared that a sitting president is immune from federal law as long as he or she remains in office. Thus the only immediate constraint on our avowedly tyrannical president’s authority is the threat of impeachment and removal — which, given the composition of the Senate, strikes most political observers as no constraint at all.

    In this context, is a “Lock him up” chant really a more harrowing sign of creeping authoritarianism than a display of polite tolerance for the tyrant-in-chief would be? The former involves citizens ironically repurposing their abusive leader’s own demagoguery to protest his lawlessness. The latter assures that leader that he is not only above the law but also immune from social sanction.

    To conclude that the “Lock him up” chant was an affront to democratic values rather than an expression of them, Victor and Scarborough must ignore most of the relevant context, impute the darkest possible intention to the chanters, and wildly misconstrue their relationship with Trump. Nationals fans are not the president’s political opponents; they are his constituents. And their conflict is not rooted (solely) in disagreements about policies and values; Trump enjoys extraordinary power over the chanters’ lives, a power he routinely abuses, in Victor’s and Scarborough’s own estimations.

    A stronger version of the anti-chant argument would focus on its potential consequences, rather than its moral character: Chanting “Lock him up” at Trump may be a worthy expression of democratic dissent in the abstract, but in our hyperpolarized polity, it risks eroding norms of partisan toleration and emboldening the reactionary right.

    And yet, while this argument at least does not require misrepresenting Sunday night’s events, it rests more on faith than evidence. After all, what in the past three years (or past two decades) of American politics suggests that the center-left’s good faith and performative respect for institutional traditions will constrain the right’s illiberalism and abuses of power? (Did Nancy Pelosi’s painstakingly slow, deliberate approach to impeachment prevent Republicans from casting her inquiry as a “Soviet-style witch hunt?” Did Barack Obama’s refusal to publicly disclose the FBI’s investigation into the Trump campaign before Election Day 2016 prevent Republican leaders from accusing him of orchestrating that investigation for electoral purposes?)

    The indiscriminate “respect for the office of the president” that Coons counsels has done little to arrest our republic’s descent into lawlessness. If anything, it has hastened that regression: What, other than such “respect,” enabled the DOJ to insist, without controversy, that Donald Trump can’t be held legally accountable for federal crimes until he leaves office? Or the Obama administration to insist, with self-righteousness, that George W. Bush must not be held legally accountable for his abuses of power upon returning to private life?

    Americans did not win their republic by respecting the offices of tyrants (whether those tyrants occupied the throne in 18th-century London or the plantations of 19th-century Richmond). We’ll need a little less reflexive deference to decorum — and a little more “Nattitude” — if we wish to keep it.

    _________________
    Chanting ‘Lock Him Up’ at a Lawless President is Good for Democracy GO3ERChanting ‘Lock Him Up’ at a Lawless President is Good for Democracy D5SsG


    UFC Fight Night 192: Smith vs. Spann
    Kyng
    Posts : 568
    Join date : 2018-05-30
    Status :
    Online
    Offline

    PostKyng Tue Oct 29, 2019 4:27 pm

    As much as I don't like the guy... I don't see how these chants are "good for democracy", or even why 'democracy' should be the goal in this instance.

    The decision to lock someone up is not something that should be put to a vote among the general public. It needs to be made by judges and jurors who have heard from witnesses and examined and reviewed the available evidence. In my opinion, "Trial by popular opinion" is dangerous, and it's not something that has any place in a free country.

    Not to mention, it's descending to Trump's level, and it's horrible for political discourse, which is damaged enough as it is >_< .
    The Last Outlaw
    The Last Outlaw
    Male Posts : 1847
    Age : 45
    Join date : 2018-05-25
    Location : Salem, Oregon
    Status :
    Online
    Offline

    http://betheasbyte.com/forum

    PostThe Last Outlaw Tue Oct 29, 2019 9:19 pm

    @Kyng wrote:As much as I don't like the guy... I don't see how these chants are "good for democracy", or even why 'democracy' should be the goal in this instance.

    The decision to lock someone up is not something that should be put to a vote among the general public. It needs to be made by judges and jurors who have heard from witnesses and examined and reviewed the available evidence. In my opinion, "Trial by popular opinion" is dangerous, and it's not something that has any place in a free country.

    Not to mention, it's descending to Trump's level, and it's horrible for political discourse, which is damaged enough as it is >_< .

    So I guess it's OK when South Korea does it.

    I guess it's OK when Venezuela does it and our lawmakers can celebrate their democratic spirit

    But let us do it, and we are dead wrong? Did I miss something here??

    _________________
    Chanting ‘Lock Him Up’ at a Lawless President is Good for Democracy GO3ERChanting ‘Lock Him Up’ at a Lawless President is Good for Democracy D5SsG


    UFC Fight Night 192: Smith vs. Spann

    View previous topic View next topic Back to top

    Create an account or log in to leave a reply

    You need to be a member in order to leave a reply.

    Create an account

    Join our community by creating a new account. It's easy!


    Create a new account

    Log in

    Already have an account? No problem, log in here.


    Log in

     
    Permissions in this forum:
    You cannot reply to topics in this forum